Psychoanalysis



Applying a psychoanalytical approach to Project Runway will allow us to uncover the messages sent to viewers and society about how to see fashion and how it has been applied to our culture. Gillian Rose defines psychoanalysis as "a range of theories that deal most centrally with human subjectivity, sexuality and the unconscious" (Rose, p. 149). When thinking about how psychoanalysis can be applied to this television show many theories will hold a great deal of importance on contrasting the details of the images being presented as well as taking the show as a whole and breaking it down by detail. A viewer is able to look at these images and identity with them on a level of wanting to be and or look like them. In this section we will look also look at how the models of Project Runway are viewed in their own show called Models of the Runway.

One of the most common forms of psychoanalysis is scopophilia, "the pleasure of looking" (Rose, p. 149). Viewers who actively watch the show express scopophilia because they enjoy what they're seeing while they sit down on their couch once a week to watch the slightly dramatic reality show that shows designers fighting till the end to get to the top. These viewers take pleasure in the fact that from a distance they are allowed to observe what is going on in the reality show and get their own form of pleasure out of it. Reality television is "programs that film real people as they live out events in their lives, continued or otherwise, as they occur" (Beck, Hellmueller, Aeschbacher, p. 5), in this case anywhere from twelve to sixteen designers from around the country come together to live their lives on the show until they either win or get eliminated from the competition. Considering Project Runway as a reality show allows the viewers to get attached to these peoples lives. People on the show open up to viewers by expressing their good times and their bad, which then allows the viewers to feel as if they now have an emotional attachment to them. Viewers feel a sense of "connectedness" where they create a relationship with the characters or in this case the designers and models of the show (Patino, Kaltcheva, Smith, p. 289).

When watching Project Runway and Models of the Runway, every single character is subjective in some way. Rose defines subjectivity as a way "that we make sense of non-rational ways of understanding" (p. 153). By this Roses' meaning is that by subjecting the characters on both shows the viewers are able to feel things emotionally. This can lead to viewers asking themselves questions about the show due to their emotional feelings about a character. Questions could be: why did they get kicked off? Did Heidi really not like the full outfit? Did that person really not get eliminated? I thought his/her work was awful. These are just a few examples of how a person could feel during or after the show. The designers and models also become subjects for the judges. Judges have the ability to see what the designers have been working on and get to evaluate their work as the models strut down the runway at the end of the week. In Reality TV: Remaking Television Culture, Heather Hendershot expresses thoughts on how a show like Project Runway, or any reality television show, can be subjective in some way. The quote, "to win one must be evaluated by a judge or boss, in some manner that presents itself as objective or subjective" (p. 246), meaning that due to the circumstances of the show both designers and models have to go through an evaluation period where they are put on the spot. They then get to hear the feelings of either the judges on how they did or in the models case they hear how the designers felt about working with them and how they thought they did on the runway. Models and designers also have to undergo the use of gaze. Gaze is defined as "how the subject is seen" (Rose, p. 172). In this case viewers and judges are gazing upon the designers and models. Gaze has the ability to go on even when you can see now longer. So when applying this concept to both Project Runway and Models of the Runway we can ask ourselves the question of what happens once the show is over? In this case we can assume viewers apply what they see on the reality television to their own fashion identity.

In this image, the models are all striking three different poses as they head down the runway. The purpose of the models is to show off their designers clothing for the week. The facial expression of all three models varies as well. The first model (going left to right) has her head and body slightly tilted to left. She has a serious stare but she leaves us with the question as to where her attention is going. Her glare and mouth structure gives viewers the feeling of suspense because her facial expression could be seen as sexual. The model in the middle has a very straightforward look. She is showing viewers that she is walking down the runway with a purpose and that purpose is to show off the clothing. Finally, our last model is posing with her shoulders out and head forward in order to give a better look at her shoulders since the dress is strapless. This is also a more sexual pose due to her posture and facial expression. Each of the models are interpellating the audience in order to get their attention to make them see all of them as desirable. Their job is to catch the eyes of the audience members to make them think that they either desire to be the model or desire to own the clothes that they're wearing. They want to persuade the audience members to feel as if they should want everything they have in order to feel the same type of beauty and power that the models feel when walking down the runway. Designers have the ability to make the models have a "real" sense of who they are by applying their styles and putting it on the model. It allows models to go down the runway and translate a particular look that then gets turn into a real picture like the ones shown (Handyside). Not only are the models being looked at in a scopophilic way they can also find the pleasure in being looked at as well (Mulvey, p. 395). If they didn't enjoy being looked at on the runway they wouldn't be models.


When the models are shown in a certain way, such as in revealing clothes, it gives the audience members a chance to express their fantasy and desire to be them. Desire is "the pleasure gained from fantasizing about lost objects" (Rose, p. 178). "Ordinary people can watch the show, see people like themselves, and fantasize that that they could gain celebrity status by being on television" (Reiss and Wiltz, p.374), meaning that viewers have the ability to want what they see. In A Tale of Inscritption/Fashion Statements, Kim Swachuk states: "It is, perhaps, this longing for a world of fantasy, this desire for the return, and the smell and touch of the body which the fashion industry capitalizes on" (p. 60). The fashion industry has the power to make viewers of a fashion television show feel the need to desire and want what they see. In Project Runway the viewers have the ability to desire three things: the designer, the fashion or clothing, and the model.


The designer is in charge of bringing to the table their outlook on what fashion should be like due to the challenge that they are given for that week. Viewers can desire to be the designer that is on the show because they could one day aspire to be a top designer and be given the opportunity that the contestants are given. In Fashion as Communication: A Semiotic Analysis of Fashion Katrina Kuruc explains how fashion can be seen as "thoughts, feelings, beliefs, and desires that the designer has are somehow expressed or reflected in and by the garment he or she produces" (Kuruc, p. 199), meaning that the designers desires can be rubbed off onto the viewers who wish to be in their position. Viewers who wish to be the next top designer not only desire to be the designer but they also judge the designers work and compare it to what they possibly could create. Dana Cloud introduces the idea of selling the "fantasy bribe" to viewers. When applying the "fantasy bribe" to Project Runway the producers of the show are trying to sell the idea of making everyone else want to be the next top designer.

The fashion industry has a huge influence on our culture. People who follow fashion know how much it can change. Women in particular feel the obligation to stay connected to the fashion industry in order to fit in. Watching a show like Project Runway gives viewers a chance to see fashion applied to many different areas of interest based on the challenge for the week. In The Feminine Idea Roland Barthes talks about a females view of fashion. He states, "She is what the women of fashion should (identity) and do (active situation). She is what the female reader is and, at the same time what she dreams of being" (Thesander, p. 55), this quote tells us that females desire to be apart of the fashion industry. A normal question that can be asked to female viewers who keep up with fashion reality television is "Do you attempt to keep up current fashion" and the answer to this is that 84% of women say that they do (Crane, p. 547). Crane also states, "following fashion was motivated by a desire to be accepted by peer" (p. 548). Women feel the need to be accepted by others due to what the fashion industry has expressed through television shows and magazines.

When looking at the models you see a beautiful figure walking down the runway wearing creative and beautiful clothes. When viewers see these models they fantasy and desire to be them. The desire is to have what they have. Whether that is their beauty or their clothing, models are used to sell the idea of what women should be. Models have the power to change the idea of what one single person thinks about fashion or beauty just by how they present themselves and if the viewer expresses a desire or fantasy of wanting that a model has. This at times can be a damaging effect on female viewers as fashion is often time known to "play a dominant role in oppression of women and their bodies" (Thompson and Haytko, p. 26).
Home Discourse Audience



Bibliography:

Beck, Daniel, Lea Hellmueller, and Nina Aeschbacher. "Factual Entertainment and Reality TV." Communication Research Trends 31.2 (2012): 4-23. Print.

Crane, Diana. "Gender and Hegemony in Fashion Magazines: Women's Interpretations of Fashion Photographs." Gender, Race, and Class in Media: A Text-Reader. Ed. Gail Dines and Jean Humez. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 2003. 314-332. Print.

Cloud, Dana. "The Irony Bribe and Reality Television: Investment and Detachment in The Bachelor."Critical Studies in Media Communication 27.5 (210): 413-27. Print.

Handyside, Fiona. "It's Either Fake or Foreign: The Cityscape in Sex and the City." Continuum 21.3 (2007): 405-18. Print.

Kuruc, Katarina. "Fashion as Communication: A Semiotic Analysis of Fashion on ‘Sex and the City’." Semiotica 2008.171 (2008): 193-214. Print.
Mulvey, Laura. “Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema.” Film Theory and Criticism: Introductory Readings. Eds. Leo Braudy and Marshall Cohen. New York: Oxford UP, 1999: 833-44.

Patino, Anthony, Velitchka D. Kaltcheva, and Michael F. Smith. "The Appeal of Reality Television for Teen and Pre-Teen Audiences." Journal of Advertising Research (2011): 288-98. Print.

Reiss, Steven, and James Wiltz. "Why People Watch Reality TV." Media Psychology 6.4 (2004): 363-78. Print.

Rose, Gillian. "Visual Methodologies: An Introduction to the Interpretation of Visual Materials". 2nd ed. London: SAGE, 2012.

Thesander, Marianne. The Feminine Ideal. London: Reaktion, 1997. 55-65 Print.

Thompson, Craig J., and Diana L. Haytko. "Speaking of Fashion: Consumers' Uses of Fashion Discourses and the Appropriation of Countervailing Cultural Meanings." Journal of Consumer Research 24.1 (1997): 15-42. Print.